QuickFill are speed loading ammo tubes made for tube-fed semi-auto rifles, like a Marlin 60. These will hold 22LR, 22 short cartridges. Quick-Fill also makes a version for 22 magnums and 17HMR cartridges. And a Big-Boy version that fit .38 special, 357, 44 magnum, 45 long-colt, and 41 magnum centerfire lever-action carbines. Cheaper per tube than doing it yourself (I tried and it ended up costing me like $6 per tube and about 20min of construction time), so it’s worth it to me to just buy these.
How it works is very simple. You open up the stopper end and load in 15 rounds of 22LR ammo. You load them in with the bullet end first. This is so when you empty them into your rifle’s mag-tube, they slide out, rim end first, and are oriented in the correct position in the tube. It fits into your mag-tube like your brass follower tube. You insert, tilt it and the rounds slide it.
Starting from an empty mag-tube with the inner follower tube removed. We’ll pop off the end and load it. About 5 seconds. Compare that with loading a round at a time. About 2-3 seconds per round. 45 seconds may not seem like a long time. But if you’re at a range that charges by the hour, time is money. And I’d rather use those saved minutes shooting rather than loading. But that’s me.
One downside some have with these tubes is is that they are too long to fit into an ammo can. So don’t. Because they’re roughly the same dimensions as your mag-tube, they’ll fit comfortably nestled next to your rifle in your rifle case or bag. As long as it’s legal in your area to transport ammo in the same container as your firearm. It’s not a magazine, it’s a storage tube.
Another criticism folks have is that the tube is very light and thin to fit inside your mag-tube, so it’s not very strong. A single tube could easily bend or break. But there’s strength in numbers. Bundle a couple together with a rubber band or even tape and suddenly a fragile tube becomes a robust bundle.
We accidentally ordered two of the same items on Amazon. Or did we? A humorous tale of Chinese copycat projects copying other Chinese products and what can happen when you share an Amazon Prime account with your spouse.
There’s a lot to like about this mini tac light. It’s as bright or brighter than some full-sized weapon lights but don’t stick out awkwardly post the muzzle. Speaking of full-sized lights, I found out that the magnetic charger is not compatible with the Olight PL-PRO. So don’t lose the charger or you’re going to have to order another one from Olight. That’s the one main downside with this light, I kinda wish it was USB-C instead.
Overall there’s a lot I like about this light: it’s bright, weighs next to nothing on my pistol, and is easy to manipulate and activate. It’s a lot better than my XC-1. Its closest competitor is the Klarus GL-1 which is about as small, has an adjustable length mounting system, is also 600 lumens but also has a strobe mode. I know some real-life Operators hate strobe (for valid reasons), so if you want a non-strobe compact weapon light go with Valkerie Mini.
The pandemic isolation has forced us to get creative with our entertainment. This giant 100-inch portable projection screen turns any living room or backyard into a movie theatre. If you own a projector, a good quality projector screen versus a plain white wall is a night and day improvement in color intensity, brightness, and clarity.
The CMMG Bravo allows you to quickly and easily convert your 5.56mm chambered AR to fire inexpensive 22LR cartridges, without having to change your barrel or receiver. All for the price of a premium Bolt-Carrier group.
Installation is simple. Pop out your receiver pin and removing your existing AR bolt and install the Bravo like a Bolt Carrier group. If you need to learn how to take out your Bolt Carrier Group. Swap out your existing bolt for the Bravo and you’re done. Next just load the Bravo mags with the 22LR of your choice. The mags are physically the same size and shape as a 30rnd AR magazine and will fit in your magwell or pouches.
We’re trying out 3 popular 22 brands and see how they perform and their accuracy with 3” targets at 50yrds. Setting up 3” targets at 50yrds, the first step was finding a new zero which was going to be different than with a 556 cartridge. I had to re-adjust my scope about 4 Mil lower and a Mil or two to the left.
I started the test with my most reliable ammo: CCI Mini-Mags 36 grain Copper Plated Hollow Points
CCI Mini-Mag 36gr CPHP 1260fps
Like many, CCI is my go-to benchmark. It’s the most expensive ammo in this test but not by much. With better than average accuracy and reliability, it is the only mass-market ammo that consistently and reliably performs in both my rifles and pistols.
Next, I tried Federal AutoMatch.
Federal AutoMatch 40gr LRN 1200fps
The only Lead Round Nose bullet in this test. Another reason I included AutoMatch is that Federal originally designed this cartridge function better in AR-style 22 rifles. Ironically, the one failure to fire that occurred in this test, occurred with Automatch. It didn’t appear to be a light strike. And the round fired after rotating it 90º.
Finally, I tried Aguila Super Extra High Velocity, a 40gr Copper Plated round nose.
Aguila Super Extra HV 40gr CPRN 1255fps
Aquila Super Extra is my everyday ammo for my other 22 rifles. It provides excellent performance for value with the lowest Cost-Per-Round of the three ammo tested. Unfortunately, it doesn’t have a strong enough pop to cycle reliably many pistols.
In a 10 round average, CCI came out with the tightest groups. Aguila came in 2nd, and Federal Auto Match came in distant 3rd. But all three are good plinking rounds depending on the size of your plates at 25 to 50yrds.
CCI Mini-Mags Group Size: 3.3MOA
Federal AutoMatch Group Size: 6.38MOA
Aguila Super Extra Group Size: 4.65MOA
But at 100yrds it’s a different story. Due to the faster twist rate of an AR barrel, 22’s start to tumble off and shots were landing all over the place especially the Federal AutoMatch. So I recommend sticking to 50yrds.
CONCLUSIONS
Here’s some things you should be aware of. Using the Bravo leaves more fouling in your AR because 22 rimfire is dirtier round than 556 and it’s a blowback design. After using the Bravo, firing your regular 5.56 rounds will automatically clean out your gas tube. They also recommend using copper-plated rounds like the CCI Mini-Mag and Aguila Super Extra HV to reduce lead fouling in your barrel. The Bravo functions better with a light film of lubricant. I experienced some failures to feed initially because I fired it bone dry out of the box.
Taking a closer look we see how the Bravo functions by separating into two parts. The back half of the bolt blows back. The 22 cartridge feeds into an inner chamber in the front section and the bullet fires out through the tip which is shaped like a 556 cartridge, and designed to fit in your AR’s barrel chamber.
Due to this split design, the bolt hold-open paddle in your AR will not work nor will the forward assist. But your charging handle work normally. The current version of the Bravo magazines features a last-round bolt open.
So first the negatives. Accuracy. For the price, you could buy a Marlin 60 which is a far more accurate 22LR rifle. A Bravo converted AR is not going to be as accurate as your AR is normally because of the barrel twist the slightly smaller bullet diameter. But on the plus side, it’s decent plinking 50yrds.
You’ll be able to practice and train with your existing AR with all of its accessories that you’re used to, the grip, optics, etc. The best reason to get a Bravo is the cost benefits shooting 22. Granted, as we saw with recent events, during an ammo panic, 22 can be hard to get. It’s still easier to find 22LR than 556 and it’s still far, far cheaper even with jacked up panic prices.
And if you got something out of this video, please share this review on your favorite forum, blog, or on social media.
I bought this Sokani UHF Wireless Lavalier transmitter set after reading a number of positive reviews presenting it as a cheaper alternative to the similar Rode Wireless Go. I am experiencing intermittent and random sound glitches. I’m sharing my experiences in hopes to find out if other owners have experienced similar issues.
I contacted Amazon and they send me another unit and it too has the same sound drop-off glitch. With two identical units, I proceeded to rule out the cables and mic as the causes through a process of elimination. But in the end, I believe that BOTH units sent are defective. Asll the more reason to stay away from this brand.
Meets and exceeds ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 impact requirements
Package includes a soft carrying case
These Matrix Tactical Systems Airsoft Goggles were sent to me by Evike.com and today I’m going to shoot them with a full-auto burst from 1ft away with an AEG firing 0.25g BBs at 340fps (1.34 Joules). But before we destroy them, we’ll take a closer look. I review it’s build quality and eye-glass compatibility.
So here’s what you get, inside the box, we find the goggles inside a carrying case/pouch. 2 replacement lenses (clear and amber tint). And a protective cloth sock/sleeve attached to the straps reminiscent of military-issued ESS goggles. The strap is easily adjustable and is detachable from the frame but with a proprietary clipping system.
The frame lacks a foam lining which can leave some gaps depending on your face shape. This is the main shortfall in the product. They should have included a small roll or strip of foam tape. I recomend using insulating weather stripping tape to both fill in gaps and improve comfort.
The lenses have an anti-fog coating. But in my testing, they did not perform remarkably better than any other single-pain goggle I’ve used. It fogs up and quickly if you are wearing any type of cloth mouth covering. Not worse, just average. Meh.
For our BB impact the test I used .25g Matrix BioBBs fired at 340fps from an AEG. I set up a firing position with slightly less than 1ft distance between the muzzle and the goggles. On the first semi-auto shot to lense face, I thought the lens had shattered because there was some particles spraying from it. It turns out that it was just spray from left-over soapy water trapped in the frame under the lens.
I next proceeded with a full-auto burst which I was sure would crack the lens. I was frankly surprised that it survived with just a few scuff marks on the lens. I was able to wipe off the white marks but small BB shaped distortions were permanent. But the goggles were still usable and clear enough to play.
Overall I would recommend these goggles for their durability. If they would have included foam insulating trim in the frame these would be 100%. If you’re interested in picking up a pair, they are available in a variety of camo colors at Evike.com
Retailing at around $49, these headsets are about the same price as Walker Razors and Howard Leight Impact Sports. They have been supplied for this review by Opsman and Evike.com and I found them to have the best features of both the Razors and Leights; the directional stereo sound of the Howard Leights and the superior AUX audio sound or Razors (actually a bit better audio than Razor).
One sore point (literally) was that the extra-soft earpads didn’t provide sufficient spacing for my ears. They would pinch against the inside of the earcups and became uncomfortable after about 30 minutes of wearing. I replaced the foam pads with supplied gel pads which relieves the issue slightly. I suggested a larger plastic frame spacer to the OPSMEN, or simply thicker pads. I hope they offer this as an option soon.
These low profile Electronic Hearing Protectors feature a noise reduction rating of 22 decibels. 2 x AAA batteries power the unit for up to 350hrs. And if you forget to turn off the unit before putting them away, it has an auto-shutoff after 4hrs.
They’re reminiscent of MSA Sordins combat headsets but with an unusual asymmetrical slant. They’re designed with this angle so that the earcup rests against your rifle stock. It’s an effective design solution to the problem of noise leak due to a pushed earcup when you’re using iron sights.
I put together a budget portable solar setup for under $200; pairing the Beleeb 50W solar panel and the Jackery 160 solar generator/battery. These two highly-rated solar products on Amazon but they were not compatible out of the box. I had to find the appropriate cable which wasn’t as easy as I thought it would be to track down the info, so I’m sharing it with you. As an added benefit, this is also one of the most compact 160W solar setup that you can easily fit in the back of a truck cab or even a backpack.
